Psychology

Share this article:

Psychology

  • Join our comunity:

The New Way to Test Your ‘Biological’ Age

By: , Posted on: September 18, 2015

Biological Aging

How old you are depends not so much when you were born but how your clock is ticking.

From denying that age is important to obsessively monitoring the calorific content of our diets, humans obsess one way or another about getting older. How we define ageing or when you become “old” is not trivial. In biomedical studies, particular those focused on the molecular mechanisms of growing older, loss of function and biomarkers of disease are used to define how much you have aged. From my perspective, this is almost certainly misleading.

In humans, chronological age defines the time since you were born. Whether you are considered old within your community, depends on many factors. For example, when I grew up in Glasgow in the 1970s, a 60-year-old man was very old, but a 60-year-old man in Stockholm today could be almost considered middle-aged. An alternative definition for old age, articulated by Warren Sanderson and Sergei Scherbov defines when, for example, you have ten years of life expectancy left.

So the average life expectancy varies from community to community, reflecting a mix of genetics, environment and randomly determined factors. Why you wish to define “old” also depends on what you might do with the information. It could be to plan future pension liabilities or ensure adequate management of the healthcare system (or to predict when a “free” public health service goes bust). It is also important when planning human medical research, when the prevalence of a variety of diseases, for example diabetes, dementia and heart disease increases with chronological age.

Biological age

You cannot use someone’s chronological age to diagnose their health status – measuring symptoms of age-associated disease is not the same as measuring ageing. Rather than chronological age, your “biological” age is what is going to determine when you show clinical symptoms of disease. And which “age-associated” disease will depend on your genetic, epigenetic and environmental risks factors (and of course those random factors).

Our new study, published in Genome Biology, provides the first reliable tool to define this “biological age” in humans; one that is very distinct from chronological age.

We used a process called RNA-profiling to measure and compare gene expression in thousands of human tissue samples. Rather than looking for genes associated with disease or extreme longevity, we instead looked at the activation of 150 genes in the blood, brain and muscle tissue that were a hallmark of good health at the age of 65. We then used this to create a formula for “healthy ageing” that can tell us how well a person is ageing compared to others born in the same year.

sequencing
Looking into the code. www.shutterstock.com

Many people born in the same year can have a very different “biological age” score, which means that this is very different to measuring age just based on chronology. Another interesting discovery we made was that having a low score (something that could be considered as accelerated ageing) was associated with cognitive decline, which means that we could potentially use our work to predict those at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease or other dementia. This was not the case for so-called “lifestyle diseases” such as heart disease and diabetes.

Other models

Some researchers have attempted to use epigenetic changes to describe ageing in relation to outside factors. Tim Spector, an epigeneticist from King’s College London, describes epigenetics as “a mechanism that describes how genes can be switched on or off by chemical signals, a bit like a dimmer switch on a light, without altering the DNA structure … These signals can alter the way genes produce proteins or signal other genes and importantly, they can last months or years.”

One process involved in epigenetics is DNA methylation (DNAm), where the addition or removal of a methyl chemical group can alter what DNA does. But the DNAm clock has modest correlations with health outcomes and variation in the “ticking rate” is not very dramatic, though is altered by some common lifestyle factors.

Common lifestyle factors (exercise, diabetes and so on) did not alter the 150 genes that we used to define biological age and our diagnostic for human biological age is distinct from the epigenetic model, stratifies people of the same chronological age more widely and so has substantially greater practical use. For now we cannot suggest that a person’s choices influence their biological age. Likewise, the link between biological age and extreme longevity has not been studied.

What next?

The challenge now is to understand how each persons risk profile for (prevalent) “disease” interacts with their “biological” age to determine which age-related illnesses they are most likely to suffer from (first).

If we can put a number on an individual’s biological age then arguably we can apply the logic articulated by Sanderson and Scherbov, that defining how we treat and support an individual as they age might be better reflected on their project life expectancy than their chronological age. This means personalised health surveillance plans or personalised pension plans. Whether this is acceptable or embraced is an entirely different question.

This article, by James Timmons, King’s College London, was originally published in The Conversation under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivatives license. Read the original article here.

Psychology of Aging Series

Elsevier’s premier series on aging have just released 8th Editions of the volumes:

psych of aging 8thHandbook of the Psychology of Aging, 8th Edition, Edited by K Warner Schaie and Sherry Willis

This updated eighth edition of the most comprehensive text available on the effect of age on psychological processes such as language, cognition, perception, motor control, and social relations provides an important summary of the way the aging process is important to many features of our daily lives, from the workplace and family to public policy matters

handbook biology agingHandbook of the Biology of Aging, 8th Edition, Edited by Matt Kaeberlein and George Martin

The eighth edition of this very successful handbook on how basic aging processes and medical physiology affect biological systems includes new discussions of a variety of topics, including longevity pathways and interventions that modulate aging, innovative new tools that facilitate systems-level approaches to aging research and more

handbook aging social sciencesHandbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 8th Edition, Edited by Linda George and Kenneth Ferraro

This updated eight edition presents the latest research available on aging individuals, populations, and the dynamic culmination of the life course, providing a comprehensive synthesis and review of the latest research findings in the social sciences of aging that is of particular interest to scientists and researchers in a broad array of specialties

To purchase a copy of one of these series, visit the Elsevier Store.  Apply discount code STC215 at checkout to receive 25% off the list price and free global shipping.

Connect with us on social media and stay up to date on new articles

One thought on “The New Way to Test Your ‘Biological’ Age

  1. Very nice article James. My grandfather developed vascular dementia after his 70th year. Many people told me, that he always healed himself quite fast (his cell proliferation was/is quick I suppose). I am wondering, if there has been found any connection between cell proliferation speed and decline in the older age, when the cells get depleted? Like trade off: you can be “clocked” for the longer life span, and thus, you do not heal as fast, or you can heal quicker, but your life span is as a result shortened.

Comments are closed.

Psychology

Researchers and clinicians in psychology work across a vast array of sub-disciplines, including applied psychology, addictions, cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, experimental physiological psychology, forensic psychology, neuropsychology, and behavioral and cognitive therapy. For these professionals, and students as well, cross-disciplinary study is a given. For more than 75 years, Elsevier has cultivated portfolios of psychology books, eBooks, and journals covering current and critical issues in all of these areas. This vital content provides a sound basis of understanding for all those involved in this multi-faceted field.