Share this article:
Treating Hidden Wounds – the Case for Putting Psychologists in Trauma Programs
Imagine this: A 17-year-old girl has been shot in an apparent mall robbery. Her parents rush to the hospital only to be told they cannot see their daughter yet – the medical team is actively working to save her life. The unknown is terrifying, the waiting torturous.
When they are finally allowed to enter the trauma center to see their daughter, they see 10-15 professionals, all gowned and gloved with masks on their faces, surrounding their daughter, each attending to a different task such as starting an IV, monitoring her vital signs, preparing to take bedside X-rays. Her parents just want to know if will she be OK. But this is exactly the information the treatment team is not able to provide, at least not yet.
Nearly 2.5 million people a year are hospitalized because of a traumatic injury. When someone is taken to a trauma center or emergency room they enter a chaotic place. They are surrounded by bright lights and blinking machines. Their clothes are cut off. Doctors and nurses wearing masks and sterile clothing crowd around, asking questions and giving them medications and examining their body. This assault to the senses is traumatic on its own, beyond the injuries that brought them to the hospital in the first place. And it not only affects the patient, but their family and friends as well, who are helpless to “make it all better.”
And yet routine psychological care for victims of traumatic injuries and their families is not available at all hospitals. Exact numbers are hard to come by, but we know of less than ten trauma programs nationally that routinely employ a psychologist as a member of the core trauma treatment team.
Some trauma centers address the emotional needs of patients through pastoral care or social services, while others only call in a psychologist or psychiatrist for isolated cases such as suicide attempts or a loved one’s death.
The emotional injuries from trauma can be as disabling as the physical injuries, so doesn’t it make sense to have psychologists routinely in trauma programs to look after their patients’ psychological well-being?
Traumatic injuries don’t just leave physical scars
Think about that 17-year-old girl and her parents. She needs intense care for her physical injuries. Her parents might need psychological support. And when that girl pulls through, she might need psychological care to cope with her injuries and recovery as well.
Trauma centers are required to have surgeons, emergency medicine physicians, neurosurgeons, cardiovascular surgeons and orthopedists on faculty. But psychologists are not on that list. While trauma centers are mandated to provide psychosocial support programs during the immediate recovery phase, what is not routine is ongoing psychological care for patients and families.
Health care has been slow to acknowledge the invisible wounds trauma creates and the impact this has on emotional and physical recovery. How someone responds to these emotional demands is key to their overall recovery. Studies have shown that trauma survivors are at increased risk for many psychological issues including depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance abuse.
Indeed, as researchers on post-traumatic stress disorder have noted:
“We may reduce the costs of trauma, both personal and social, by beginning to address the collateral social and psychological complications of injury with the same intensity as we approach the physical.”
Such psychological wounds, the hidden suffering in trauma, must be recognized and treated. Trauma programs need to treat the whole person. That’s where we come in.
Putting psychologists within the core trauma program
As medical trauma psychologists on faculty for a very busy Level I Trauma Center and trauma program at the University of Florida (UF), we confront this all the time. Everyday we help patients and families manage the emotional burden of a traumatic injury and its aftermath. Most have never before experienced a trauma center or an intensive care unit except for what they have seen on television, and none of them planned to be here.
Though some individuals arrive to the hospital seeking emergency care for psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia or major depressive disorder, these patients represent only a small number of the people with whom we serve. Our primary patient population are people with traumatic physical injuries and their families.
Our hospital was first in the nation to hire a licensed psychologist as a full faculty member for its in-patient trauma program. Dr Kamela Scott began developing the UF Psychological Services program back in 1995 after the hospital realized that trauma patients weren’t receiving the psychological care that they needed. In most medical trauma systems at the time, the emotional needs of patients and families either were not addressed at all, or were only addressed on an as needed basis. The idea behind the UF Psychological Services program is to treat psychological care as a routine and integral part of treatment for patients and families after trauma.
Since then it’s grown – adding another full-time faculty psychologist and a post-doctoral fellow. We also train surgery residents on medical ethics and decision making, effective communication with families, managing disruptive patients and families, and conflict resolution.
The trauma team can call us to evaluate a patient, just like they might call a neurosurgeon or cardiovascular specialist. We might be asked to help a patient and family adjust to life after traumatic brain or spinal cord injury. Or it could mean intervention with victims of domestic violence or assault. Or we might provide support to families when the decision is made to end artificial life support for a loved one.
Through this collaborative approach, the entire treatment team works together to help the patient recover from devastating injuries physically and psychologically and works to help people adjust to and cope with the overall effects of their injuries.
And we also look after the needs of patient’s families. That might mean addressing their fears and concerns and offering guidance about how to support their loved one’s physical and emotional recovery.
Care doesn’t end when the patients goes home
We can’t view the impact of trauma in terms of physical injury alone. If we do, we miss an entire aspect of what it means to be human: Emotion.
Victims of motor vehicle crashes can become too anxious to get behind the wheel of a car again, and that might make them withdraw socially. Survivors of physical assault may fear walking the streets or into parking lots which can make it hard to return to normal daily life. Someone with facial scarring or a loss of physical function due to injury may have problems with self esteem. They see a different face in the mirror. He or she may be unable to return to work due to physical disability.
Medical trauma psychologists, like us, serve as psychological case-managers for life after discharge from the hospital. Time and again we have found that our patients simply don’t know what resources are available to help them or how to access those services.
We can connect them to community mental health providers with expertise in various treatments needed, such as treatment for anxiety disorders, depression or substance abuse. We can also link our patients to providers within their health insurance networks, and to support groups close to home.
Psychological follow-up care provides a safety net for patients and families throughout the recovery process to help them reach the ultimate goal of returning to function, physically and emotionally.
This article was originally published in The Conversation under a Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives license. Read the original article here.
If you found this article interesting you may be interested in the book Reconstructing Meaning After Trauma: Theory, Research and Practice. This book presents actual therapeutic work with clients who present with traumas or other life disruptions by providing clinicians with information on the construction of meaning. It includes material on diverse mechanisms of clinical change and positive-promoting processes.
It covers identifiable treatments and specific lines of research in assisting clients in developing new meaning, such as posttraumatic growth (after sexual assault, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer, destructive natural phenomena, such as hurricanes, and refugee experiences), and finding benefit (in the context of loss—loss of health, or loss of a loved one).
We are pleased to offer you a look at the book with this free chapter called “Making Meaning and Trauma Recovery” that summarizes the many diverse ways that trauma can impact individuals, communities, and societies and the many interpretations and meanings that can occur in response.
The general scope of social sciences is vast, and Elsevier’s collection of journals, books, and eBooks examine in detail a wide range of topics in this area, from sociology, law, and cognitive science to political science, education, and linguistics. Our Chandos imprint in particular, known for high-quality scholarship in Asian studies, library and information science, and business management, reflects Elsevier’s continuing commitment to these crucial areas of study.